Does Christ limit Christian Liberty?

I well remember when I first received my driving license. Like me, you may have thought that getting behind the wheel on your own opened up the whole world. Driving around town was an exhilarating experience of liberty: not having to depend on others for a ride, going to the places you wanted, when you wanted. But with this new freedom also came new restrictions like the speed limits, other vehicles on the road, and the constant need to refuel.

First Principle: Christian Liberty is Limited

In 1 Corinthians chapters eight through ten, the Apostle Paul is reorienting the Corinthian church to the proper perspective of their freedoms in Christ: “It is not about you.” First, Paul establishes that there are limits to Christian liberty. In verse 23, he quotes a popular slogan embraced by Greco-Roman society and apparently adopted by some believers: “All things are lawful for me.” To many people, liberty means freedom without restraint, restrictions, or responsibilities.

However, Scripture reminds us that beneficial freedom has boundaries. Paul clarifies this slogan in two ways. First, not all morally neutral things are expedient or profitable for the believer. A simple illustration may be helpful. Most people would not consider eating a donut wrong, but if a person is competing in a race, eating a donut in the middle of the event would not contribute to success and may even be a dangerous choking hazard. Though permissible, it is not profitable.

Second, Paul explains that not everything permitted is edifying, that is, it does not build up one’s own character or others. Not all good things encourage or strengthen believers in their love for the Lord. The Bible may not forbid certain cell phone use, but even permissible activity may not draw one closer to Christ. Christian freedom must be exercised with wisdom and spiritual discernment informed by Scripture.

When making decisions about questionable matters such as associations, activities, or attire our first concern should not be, “Does this harm me?” Any rational person can think in those terms. Rather, the sanctified person must investigate, “Will this strengthen my relationship with God? Will this deepen my love for Christ?”

Liberty in Christ should direct us toward greater conformity to Christ. In practice, this means that believers will voluntarily refrain from some good and even acceptable actions to pursue greater spiritual development. The exercise of Christian liberties should promote Christ’s lordship in our lives.

Second Principle: Christian Liberty does Affect Others

The second idea that the Apostle Paul stresses to reorient our thinking about Christian liberty is that our freedoms should spiritually benefit other believers and unbelievers (v. 24). Not only should we consider our own spiritual growth, but we must also consider how the use of our liberty affects others. This stands in direct contrast to the self-centered attitude reflected in the Corinthian slogan, “All things are lawful for me” (v. 23). Our choices affect the people in our lives and affect how they think about the God we proclaim.

Paul reminds the Corinthian church that the earth does not revolve around them. Christian liberty is not merely about personal rights; it is also about loving others. At times, our freedoms may need to be decreased so that others can see Christ in a greater way through our disciplined devotion.

To illustrate these principles, Paul presents three practical scenarios demonstrating how believers should exercise Christian liberty for both personal sanctification and the spiritual welfare of others (vv. 25-29).

The First Scenario: Purchasing Meat in the Marketplace

In the first example, a believer is shopping at the marketplace and finds a good deal on fresh steaks but does not know their origin. Paul teaches that the believer is free to purchase and eat the meat (v. 25). If there is no known association with idolatry, there is no need to investigate further for the sake of one’s conscience.

Believers should not create controversy where none exists. Christians need not adopt extreme or pharisaical restrictions upon their liberties. At the same time, we must not be naïve concerning ungodly associations and the message those connections communicate to others.

Paul supports his argument by quoting Psalm 24:1, reminding the Corinthians that “The earth is the Lord’s, and the fullness thereof.” Since God created all things, all food ultimately belongs to Him and may be enjoyed in Him with gratitude. Peter was given this lesson in Acts 10. God’s ownership of creation grants believers freedom to enjoy His gifts responsibly.

The Second Scenario: Dining in an Unbeliever’s Home

The second scenario shifts from the public marketplace to a communal meal (v. 27). A believer is invited to a dinner feast in the home of an unbeliever. Paul indicates that if the believer desires to attend, he is free to do so.

In both ancient culture and many cultures today, sharing a meal carries significant relational meaning. The Lord’s Supper, for example, symbolizes the believer’s identification with Christ and submissive participation in His sacrificial atonement by receiving the bread and cup (v. 16). Sitting at the same table and sharing food signifies fellowship and unity. Paul therefore instructs believers that when food is served in the unbeliever’s home and no idolatrous association is promoted they should eat without questioning the host. They may freely partake with a clear conscience.

The Third Scenario: Eating Meat that is Associated with Idolatry

The final scenario introduces a slight change to the second scenario (v. 28). This time while dining at the unbeliever’s home, someone informs the follower of Christ that the meat has been offered to pagan idols. The association is now known. They know, the believer knows, and they know that the believer knows. What would you do?

God’s command is clear: do not eat (v. 28). Some may push back, “It’s only meat,” or “It’s just a dinner with friends.” However, the issue is not the neutral food itself but the association and presumed promotion of idolatry just by eating the meat.

To knowingly partake in food identified with idol worship would communicate acceptance of a system that rivals the worship of the one true God, Jesus Christ (vv. 20-21). Believers are free to eat unless an anti-Christ association has been established. Once that association is made known, followers of Christ must abstain for the sake of other people’s conscience. Our freedoms in Christ should never be used in a way that allows others to think we approve of or participate in practices that oppose Christ.

Paul again appeals to Psalm 24:1, but with heightened emphasis. This becomes the Christian’s motto for liberty: Because all things belong to God, all things should be used exclusively for His glory (v. 31). The Christian’s freedom in Christ is limited by the responsibility to rightly represent Christ to other believers and to a watching world (1 Peter 4:4; Titus 2:14). God has graciously given believers freedom in the gospel, not to pursue carnality, but to pursue Christ and His Holy likeness to display God’s glory.

Image created by Adobe Firefly