Legalizing Child Sex Abuse? | AIG

We’ve been warning about it for years: once a culture abandons the authority of God’s Word, then anything goes. Our culture has redefined sexuality to the point where the only remaining ethic is “consent,” a completely arbitrary standard (and who or what defines consent is an increasingly thorny issue). What’s to stop the redefinition from including children, multiple partners, or even animals? And that’s exactly what we see now at an increasing rate.

I’ve talked before about the growing rise of polyamory (“many loves”) and the attempt to get it redefined as just another sexual orientation. Well, now the same thing is happening with pedophilia.

A recent column in The Federalist includes this warning in the subtitle,We cannot dismiss the campaign to legalize pedophilia as fringy stuff that will get nowhere. It’s real and it’s here and it’s gaining strength.THEY CLAIM CHILDREN ARE SEXUAL BEINGS TOO AND WHO ARE WE TO DENY A CONSENTING CHILD THAT RIGHT?

Activists are claiming it’s just another sexual orientation, and some are going as far as to make the argument that “kids can decide for themselves how to express themselves and shouldn’t be denied a choice in how they identify—no matter how young they are.” They claim children are sexual beings too and who are we to deny a consenting child that right? Read the full article from The Federalist.Some may say that this is still “fringy stuff.” But radical sex education curriculums, drag queen story hours at public libraries, and the growing sexual content in children’s programming are only going to increase the sexualization of our children. What our culture is pushing is dangerous, and it’s simply the logical consequence of the sexual and gender revolutions (as Romans chapter 1 outlines). Don’t be deceived—those revolutionaries aren’t satisfied with the legalization of gay “marriage” and the acceptance of a transgender ideology. More is coming. . . .More here

Note: All posts in News ItemsOpinion Pieces, and Home & Family are offered as a matter of interest to our readers. They do not necessarily represent the views of FBFI. They may often represent a different point of view which we think our readers might like to be aware.